Georgetown Businesses and Residents Don’t Support Evans’ Meter Proposal

Today, GM turns over the reins of the Georgetown Metropolitan for a day to his friend and fellow Georgetowner Ken Archer to discuss Jack Evans recent parking proposals:

Councilmember Jack Evans’ proposal to roll back parking meter rates and hours of enforcement in commercial corridors is based, according to Evans, on the complaints and requests of businesses and residents in his ward. However, a survey of organizations representing residents and businesses in Georgetown fails to find anyone asking Evans for his proposal.

His proposal passed out of his committee by a 3-2 vote and Evans frequently points to these complaints in defending the $5.2 million measure.

Evans told the Washington Examiner, “I get consistent complaints about the parking meters everywhere I go in my ward from residents. I can’t go into a restaurant without the owner coming out to complain about the cost of the parking meters.”

Despite this, neither the Georgetown BID nor the largest owner of Georgetown restaurants support the proposal.

The Georgetown ANC and Citizens Association have passed no resolutions and sent no letters to Evans requesting reductions in either meter rates or enforcement hours. In fact, the ANC has been working with DDOT for a couple years to put in place a performance parking pilot that would increase parking turnover and availability by charging market rates at meters.

Jennifer Altemus, president of the Citizens Association of Georgetown (CAG), told the Current in supporting a parking pilot that “We need to see more spaces open up in a timely fashion.”

Evans’ proposal would induce more visitors to drive and to park for longer periods, which means more drivers seeking fewer available spaces and circling the residential blocks for free parking spots where CAG’s members live.

Many have assumed that businesses are behind Evans’ proposal, but the opposite appears to be the case. The Georgetown BID has passed no resolution and sent no letter to Evans asking for the reductions. In fact, the Executive Director of the BID, Jim Bracco, told us, “We remain a proponent of performance parking and having rates and meter hours that can make garages more competitive.”

The president of the largest group of restaurants in Georgetown, Paul J Cohn, has also not asked Evans for the reductions. That group is Capital Restaurant Concepts, and it includes J Pauls, Paolo’s, Old Glory, Neyla and Third Edition, among other restaurants across the city.

Cohn told us that “enforcement should not end at 6:30pm, because enforcement leads to turnover of spots.” He does support reducing meter rates, but only if enforcement is stepped up to ensure that turnover goes up and doesn’t go down as a result. Turnover, for Cohn as for all organizations representing Georgetown, is the goal.

While Evans is citing the complaints and requests of his constituents in defending the roll back of meter rates and enforcement, whoever is asking for this appears to be talking to Evans and no one else.

I asked Evans on Monday to meet with David Alpert, Topher Mathews (ed: that’s GM), and me (all constituents) to discuss his proposal and have received no reply.

Some constituents are starting to complain that Evans, in his handling of Hardy Middle School and meter rates, is basing public policy on the complaints of a small number of vocal residents who don’t well represent his constituency.

Evans introduced legislation in March appointing Patrick Pope as principle of Hardy based on complaints he received from parents who sought his return after Michelle Rhee transferred him.

The complaints of a minority should obviously be heard and addressed. But sometimes that requires affirming the goal sought by constituents while meeting that goal through different means.

That’s what Council Chair Kwame Brown did with regard to Hardy Middle School in telling the Current that “Regardless of parent opinions on Mr. Pope, D.C. Public Schools has a process for principal selection” and that “the result will be a stakeholder-driven selection of a candidate who will bring the community together and work to propel Hardy Middle School to new levels of achievement.”

Evans should affirm the goals of whoever is complaining to him in Ward 2 that it shouldn’t be so hard to find a parking spot and to avoid a fine. However, he should address those complaints through a policy that will actually achieve these goals.

One of the best solutions is one we have advocated for a long time: market-rate performance parking using pay-by-cell and multi-space meters that make it easy to avoid fines. This is the best system to increases turnover and availability of parking spots in the District.

This article was cross-posted on Greater Greater Washington.

About these ads

4 Comments

Filed under Transportation

4 responses to “Georgetown Businesses and Residents Don’t Support Evans’ Meter Proposal

  1. Georgetown is but a section of Washington, D.C., then nation’s capital. As the nation’s capital, the streets of Washington, D.C. and Georgetown belong to all of the people of the United States, not just some neighborhood grouping of residents. It is everyone’s right to park in legal spaces in the residential sections of Washington, D.C. As for the parking meters, that is for the current DC administration to decide how much to gouge the visitors to our city. Funny someone doesn’t just sue the City over this matter.

  2. Ken Archer

    Dave,

    The argument being made by all of the local organizations – that turnover is the primary goal of parking policy – is one that benefits Georgetowners AND visitors. It benefits visitors and Georgetown businesses because visitors will be able to find a parking space. It benefits residents because cars will spend less time circling the blocks of our residential streets looking for an available, free spot.

  3. J Utah

    Does anyone else find it troubling that Evans regularly parks illegally at the end of 32nd Street, adjacent to to the stop sign. Not only is it unsafe, it’s a gross abuse of power to simply park illegally a few steps from your house whenever you can’t find a space directly across the street.

  4. asuka

    Ah yes, lets slag the one descent member on the council because he doesn’t support your position…on parking meters. Maybe if we try really hard, we can throw him out and then run 20 candidates in his place, none of which have a chance in hell of ever being elected.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s