ANC Round Up: Moving On Edition

Last night the ANC met for its March session. The most important item on the agenda was the adoption of its resolution opposing Georgetown’s ten year campus plan. In the end, though, this was one of the shorter items on the agenda. The rest of the evening was filled with projects and items that will surely dominate the discussion for the rest of the year.

Ten Year Plan

The discussion around the proposed resolution was strictly hemmed in. G.U., CAG/the Burleith Citizens Association, and DC Students Speaks, were each given ten minutes to make their final case. Linda Greenan, Vice President of G.U.’s external affairs, spoke first. She expressed the disappointment the school has that the parties couldn’t reach an agreement and reiterated the school’s position that the proposed plan is modest and has been tailored to address the neighbors’ complaints.

Lenore Rubino of the Burleith Citizens Assoc. and Jennifer Altemus of CAG then split up 10 minutes. They repeated their organizations previous statements that that the plan fails to seriously address the already existing negative impacts that the school has on the neighborhood and the threat that the non-student uses are going to be pushed out unless the situation is remedied. They both supported the ANC’s resolution (CAG strayed a bit from the ANC’s resolution by demanding that no students be allowed to park a car in the neighborhood).

Finally, Hao Shen of DC Students Speaks, well, spoke. He gave an energetic defense of the school’s proposal. He pointedly stated that objecting to the plan is a violation of the District’s Human Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based upon matriculation status. This would be a compelling argument, that is if the DC Court of Appeals hadn’t explicitly rejected it in one of the court cases that sprung from the last ten year plan fight (837 A.2d 58, in case you’re interested).

Beyond this, there was little other discussion. Ron Lewis echoed Greenan’s disappointment in the failure to agree. In the end the resolution was passed 6-1, with Jake Sticka voting nay.

Exxon Station Condos

EastBanc presented its plans to build condos on the site of the Key Bridge Exxon (which will close in 2012). The plan calls for 35-37 units in the building shown above.

GM can say that the other renderings make this project look slightly better than this photo above, but not that much better. The problem isn’t as much with the building itself, as with the setting. The beautiful and massive Car Barn sits just to the east and a contemporary and busy (and in GM’s opinion, tacky) apartment building sits to the west. It may be impossible to bridge that gap, stylistically.

But the main objections came regarding views. The neighbors on Prospect and in the apartment building to the west all complained about the effect the new building would have on their sight-lines. For the Prospect St. residents, it would potentially cut off the lower portion of their million dollar views. For the apartment building, it would slice off a good part of their view of the bridge. Here’s a sense of the way the building’s massing would work:

(That big square that looks like it’s sitting on Canal Rd. is just the possible penthouse removed. It probably won’t be part of the final design. Actually, none of this will probably be part of the final design, but that definitely won’t be part of the final design).

The neighbors want the building to be built basically as a wedge into the side of the wall in order to minimize the effect on their views. GM’s skeptical that would work. But he really can’t see the OGB accepting this plan as is. Either way, get used to hearing about it.

Verizon Parking Lot

Another significant new project that will get a lot of attention was also discussed, and it’s also an EastBanc project. It’s a proposed new building for the parking lot in front of the Verizon switching building (i.e. between the canal and Grace Episcopal):

This would be primarily an apartment building, offering 9 huge units. There would also be some ground floor retail.

The most significant aspect of this project is the material: stone. It is meant to echo the stonework around the canal. It’s a good thought, but it gives the project a rather imposing hulking feeling. Maybe the details would lighten the impression. That impression is particularly strong when viewed from the tow path. As proposed it would have five stories of pure stone. GM actually thinks the design works best on that side, for some reason, but from the front it has a bit too squat a look. We’ll see.

Wrap Up

GM would love to go on and on, talking more about the other items, but frankly it was way past his bed time. These damn ANC meetings are getting longer and longer. But here’s a quick summary of what else was discussed:

  • Jack Evans floated the idea of adopting an nonbinding law through the council calling for Patrick Pope to return to Hardy. He sounded out the crowd on the possibility. The general consensus seemed to be that the whole point to having a Chancellor is to avoid the council getting involved in these issues and it would set a bad precedent to start now. Evans didn’t quite agree, but seemed to get the message.
  • The Hurt Home developers have agreed to rehab Montrose Park’s tennis courts as part of their “community benefit” requirements.
  • Some new stores opening: Ann Taylor Loft (next to Madewell), Fleurir Hand Grown Chocolates (on P just west of Wisconsin), Lou Lou (where Giovanni is now), and some place called Babette in Cady’s Alley (that one might be open, but GM’s not sure).
  • DPW plans to start cracking down on trash violations soon. Like it or not, that means not putting any trash on the sidewalk in trash bags; it all needs to be in a trash bin.


Filed under ANC

6 responses to “ANC Round Up: Moving On Edition

  1. William Newton

    As I commented to you yesterday, both of these East Banc plans are really sub-par and disappointing given some of the better efforts the company has produced elsewhere, such as Cady’s Alley. The Key Bridge site is a key entrance to the village, and the proposed structure looks like a Holiday Inn from the 1960’s. The Verizon site structure may try to reference the stone of the beautiful bridge, but none of the actual buildings in that immediate area are built of that type of stone: they are brick, and pretty short. Perhaps some stone facing on the canal side and brick facing on the street side would be better, but the massing is also unattractively collegiate and inappropriate to the site.

  2. Regarding Exxon Condos:
    Too big, too ugly, and totally out of place. No respect for Georgetown.

  3. asuka

    That building is ugly, but a large slab of concrete and an Exxon station is appropriate for the space and “respectful” of Georgetown? The only problem with that building is that it’s not tall enough, but I suppose they made that concession out of respect for the Prospect street neighbors (or out of respect for their lawyers).

  4. Sampras

    Great news about the tennis courts. Those courts are really bad. Any idea on a timeline for the construction of the courts??

  5. GM

    No, not yet. They probably won’t start on the courts until they finalize the deal with the city, which probably won’t be until the fall or so.

    I agree those courts are in some very sad shape. The only reason I may still avoid these courts even after they’re renovated is that the fence is too small. There’s so little room between the baseline and the fence, it’s difficult to play comfortably. But, I too very much look forward to the courts being brought back to life.

  6. Pingback: Plans That Never Left the Drawing Board (Yet) | The Georgetown Metropolitan

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s