Last week, the Slate advice column, Dear Prudence, took a letter from a grumpy person whose circumstances are uncomfortably close to the average Georgetowner. He or she writes:
Dear Prudence,
I live in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in the country, but on one of the more “modest” streets—mostly doctors and lawyers and family business owners. (A few blocks away are billionaires, families with famous last names, media moguls, etc.) I have noticed that on Halloween, what seems like 75 percent of the trick-or-treaters are clearly not from this neighborhood. Kids arrive in overflowing cars from less fortunate areas. I feel this is inappropriate. Halloween isn’t a social service or a charity in which I have to buy candy for less fortunate children. Obviously this makes me feel like a terrible person, because what’s the big deal about making less fortunate kids happy on a holiday? But it just bugs me, because we already pay more than enough taxes toward actual social services. Should Halloween be a neighborhood activity, or is it legitimately a free-for-all in which people hunt down the best candy grounds for their kids?—Halloween for the 99 Percent
Extremely wealthy neighborhood? Check. “Modest” blocks with mere doctors and lawyers? Check. Billionaires and media moguls nearby? Check. Halloween destination for children from across the city? Check. This definitely could be a Georgetowner.
Although it definitely could not be. There are other extremely wealthy neighborhoods across the country that surely attract a diverse Halloween crowd. Continue reading





















You must be logged in to post a comment.