
It sounds obvious, but it must be stated: historical preservation is about buildings not people.
This self-evident point jumped to GM’s mind last week when he read this thoughtful piece on preservation and the neighborhood of Kingman Park. The article, by Lindsey Jones-Renaud with Karen Smith, argues in favor of the historic designation of the neighborhood (which is northeast of Capitol Hill) and moreover argues that the city ought to consider the opinions of those who no longer live in the neighborhood when deciding this question.
For those unfamiliar with the neighborhood, the authors provide a helpful and informative description:
Of the 34 neighborhood historic districts in Washington, most have a social history that reflects the achievements of white Americans and a few present multiracial histories. But in Kingman Park, the founding homeowners were exclusively African American. Despite forced segregation until the mid-twentieth century and redlining in later decades, black families like Karen’s grandparents built Kingman Park into a prosperous community. It is this history that the applicants of the historic district sought to preserve. It is the first neighborhood in Washington DC that has received historic designation because of its African American history.
(This last point is wrong. Several historic districts have a period of significance during which the neighborhood was majority African-American, such as Shaw, Blagden Alley, and the Old West End).
Jones-Renaud and Smith focus their argument on the question of whose opinion should matter when deciding whether to designate a neighborhood as an historic district. They make a persuasive case that those who have left a neighborhood, but who contributed greatly to the neighborhood’s history, should be considered at least (if not more) than those who currently live there. Continue reading →
You must be logged in to post a comment.