
Today on Georgetown Time Machine, I’m exploring another photo from the DC Historical Society. The file indicates that it is from 1925 and shows “View to east from Wisconsin Avenue NW down M Street; laying of Belgian block pavement.” But what’s the story?
The location appears correctly described. I believe this is basically the intersection of Wisconsin and M St., with the former Riggs Bank on the left and the old Heon Pharmacy (later Nathans and later still Capital One Cafe) on the right.
But what are they doing in the photo? I searched through local newspapers for items describing this event around 1925 and did not find anything. However I found a couple clues that might suggest what’s actually happening.
The photo record indicates that it includes Isaac Nordlinger. Nordlinger was the President of the Citizens Association around this time, so it suggests that this event may have been organized by the group. But newspaper articles from around that time call into question the description that they are laying Belgian blocks. If anything, they may be removing them.
Belgian blocks (sometimes mistakenly called cobblestones, which are technically something different) got frequently mentioned in newspapers of the day. But it was normally in the context of groups complaining about them. The complaints related to how they affected car traffic. And in Georgetown specifically the Citizens Association was complaining about the vibrations from the paving (which is really a complaint about the cars, of course, but the pavement got the blame instead) In classic Georgetown fashion, the worries center on broken china:


Read that last article to the bottom: It describes the proposal to shrink the M St. sidewalk width (it says Wisconsin Ave., but they’re clearly talking about M St.) in order to allow more car traffic through based on the evergreen illusion that by merely widening a road you’ll finally solve traffic congestion. At least a century ago they could be forgiven for falling into this logic trap since cars had not been around that long; plenty of modern day people do it without such an excuse.
So instead of 15 foot wide sidewalks on M St., we were left with 10 foot sidewalks, which is what we’ve still got. The irony of this is that some opponents to the widened sidewalks and streateries cite history as a reason to oppose the very idea of wider sidewalks in Georgetown. As with a lot of arguments about history in Georgetown, a fake or otherwise mistaken understanding of history is doing a lot of work justifying positions that are really more about modern day aesthetic preferences than anything related to the actual history.
As for our friends posing for the camera in 1925, I can’t really say for sure whether they’re installing Belgian blocks or removing them. Belgian blocks remained on M St. for decades after this photo in connection with the streetcar lines. Here’s what M St. further east looked like in the 1950s:

It seems unlikely to me that they were installing new Belgian blocks on M St. in 1925, just a few years after they were asking the city to pave them over. But who knows.
Interestingly, a lot of those Belgian blocks are still there under the pavement. I’ve long wished the city would consider bringing them back the surface on some streets, china tea service be damned.

























You must be logged in to post a comment.