
Hello and welcome to the April Northwest Georgetown ANC update!
Alley Repaved
Thanks to years of lobbying from residents and at least one ANC commissioner, the city finally repaired the alley behind the westside of the 1700 block of 34th St. And rather than a simple asphalt patch job, the city came and poured a completely new concrete alley. It looks great compared with how it appeared before:
Before:

After:

As much as this is a great step forward, it is also somewhat a missed opportunity. After all this time, the city chose a concrete base instead of a permeable surface. I had been advocating with the city for the alley to be included in the Green Alley project, which would have used a permeable surface with a water retention feature. This would help keep a great deal of storm water out of the drains in the first place. Alas, the city chose a traditional solution. An improvement, no doubt, but less than what it could have been.
The poor state of this alley was literally the first constituent request I fielded after taking this position. And I’m glad that it was finally addressed. But it’s also a good lesson for how much of this job involves two steps forward and one step back.
Transportation Study Draft Recommendations Released and Public Meeting
The District Department of Transportation released its draft recommendations as part of the Access and Circulation Study that it has been conducting since last year. Hopes have been high that this study and its recommendations could make a significant dent in long-term transportation challenges faced in Georgetown.
Here is are the draft recommendations:
The recommendations are listed by specific location. And there are several recommendations that touch directly on my Single Member District. They are as follow, with my personal response to each. (And before I get into them, I wanted to highlight up-front that there will be a public workshop presenting all of the study’s recommendation on Tuesday April 2nd at 6:30 at St. John’s. Please try to come out if you can!):
Intersection of Wisconsin Ave., Reservoir Rd. and 33rd St.

The intersection of Wisconsin, 33rd and Reservoir is an exceptionally dangerous one. When I did my walk with the DDOT representative, I asked to start here due to the hazardous conditions. The dangerous behavior I was concerned about occurred within minutes of our arrival, so much so that the DDOT representative joked that I had arranged for actors to play it out for him. I wish.
The dangerous behavior is familiar to anyone who walks through here. Drivers speed down Wisconsin, making crossing the street exceptionally risky, particularly at the marked crosswalk next to A Mano. Additionally drivers coming out of 33rd St. almost always end up blocking the crosswalk while they search for a break in traffic. Drivers also continue to make right turns on red at the intersection of Reservoir and Wisconsin, which is no longer permitted. This is exceptionally dangerous for pedestrians legally trying to cross Reservoir northbound because drivers on Reservoir inevitably only look left before hitting the gas the moment a gap in traffic appears. I have been nearly run over and killed in this manner multiple times at this intersection.
(It’s also a fair point that the new no-right-on-red has likely contributed to additional back-up of drivers on this road. I recommended that DDOT look into the signal timing to address this.)
Additionally, a great number of commuters come through this intersection to use Reservoir as a cut-through to 32nd St., in order to avoid traffic on Wisconsin.
The recommendations would address some, but not all, of these issues. It calls first for coordinated signalization. I believe this is largely about the signal timing, as I mentioned above.
It also calls for “improved sign locations and infrastructure”. I believe that means installing flex posts to make the turn from 33rd Street to Wisconsin Ave. more perpendicular. This forces drivers to take a more deliberate and, ideally, safe approach to Wisconsin. I agree with this goal, but I also know that flex posts are going to be contentious. Personally, I think the value and importance of making our roads safer is a higher priority than making sure they’re aesthetically pleasing. Safety should be the first and most important goal, aesthetics should be secondary. That is not to say aesthetics should be of no concern, just secondary. Perhaps a better structure or material is possible than flex posts. But we should not put safety on hold while we find one.
Continue reading


























You must be logged in to post a comment.