What Apple’s Proposal May Have Looked Like

Riddle Me This Steve...

As reported by the indispensable Georgetown Current, and then picked up upon by Washington Paper City Desk and Greater Greater Washington (hell even the Wall Street Journal got in on it) Apple has been having a tough time getting design approval for its proposed store at 1229 Wisconsin (where the French Connection UK used to be). Its most recent proposal was rejected at the December ANC 2E meeting (which GM attended but had to leave before they got around to this). Two days later, the Old Georgetown Board (which carries more even greater weight than the “great weight” of the ANC) also rejected the most recent design.

There’s been a lot of talk but no visual plans are readily available (if only GM had stuck around that meeting…) Into that void, GM has fired up Photoshop and tried to come up with a visual approximation of what the most recent plans may look like. Take a look after the jump:

As described, the plan includes:

  • A glass lower story
  • A white stone upper facade
  • A big window in the shape of the company’s logo

So what would that look like? Maybe something like this:

Apple's Proposal

One caveat: the is some discussion in the reports that the proposal is only one story. However, that conflicts with the specific descriptions of the proposal, which seem to include at least two and probably three stories.

In GM’s view, this is not an appropriate design for Georgetown. While a few storefronts in Georgetown have modern touches (e.g. big plate glass windows, simple clean lines) none are full-out modern from toe to tip the way that Apple’s design (apparently) is.

What do you think?

About these ads

11 Comments

Filed under Retail

11 responses to “What Apple’s Proposal May Have Looked Like

  1. Pingback: What’s In Store for Social Safeway? «

  2. Pingback: Fisher to Georgetown: I Want My Shiny Plastic «

  3. Pingback: ANC Roundup: An Apple Falls in Line «

  4. Mike Licht

    The Apple Store controversy is really a plot by that interfering schemer Bill Gates.

  5. Pingback: Vox Populi » Georgetown ANC Wrapup: Hydrant woes and apples to Apple Stores

  6. Pingback: Apple 2.0 » Blog Archive » Apple’s first D.C. store: Design by committee

  7. Pingback: tbsnetworks - Apple’s first D.C. store: Design by committee

  8. Pingback: Jim’s Trading News » Blog Archive » Apple’s first D.C. store: Design by committee

  9. Pingback: Apple 2.0 » Blog Archive » Apple’s first D.C. store: Design by committee

  10. Pingback: Guess Who’s One?: The Second Most Popular Post «

  11. Pingback: Vox Populi » Old Georgetown Board has problems with another new business’ design

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s