Tag Archives: Voting

The Morning Metropolitan

Photo by Afagen.

Good morning Georgetown, here’s the latest:

  • Go Vote! And when voting for At Large, vote for David Grosso!
  • Rugby is probably closing (apparently Ralph Lauren is closing all Rugby stores).

1 Comment

Filed under The Morning Metropolitan

How Georgetown Voted

Photo by mhaithica.

Last week, DC’s Democrats, Republicans and Greens got a chance to vote in their respective party’s primaries. For local DC offices, the Democrat primary is the de facto general election, so this primary is more important than many party primaries. So did Georgetown come out and vote, and if so how?

Well about 8,000 Georgetowners are registered with a party in DC. And 729 came out to vote last week, so that’s a turnout ratio of about 9%. That’s pretty bad versus the rest of the city, which had a turnout around 15%. Of course it’s also just really bad versus any election.

Most of the Georgetown ballots were uncontested, but here are the results from a few of the contested elections: Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Election

The Morning Metropolitan

Photo by Daquella Manera.

Good morning Georgetown, here’s the latest:

Leave a comment

Filed under The Morning Metropolitan

Georgetown Votes Heavily for Mara

On Tuesday, a tiny electorate sent Vincent Orange back to Council (despite GM’s clear instructions to the contrary). But it was with little help from Georgetown, which went heavily for Republican Patrick Mara.

Here are the numbers:

  • Mara – 463 – 61.41%
  • Biddle – 116 – 15.38%
  • Weaver – 79 – 10.48%
  • Orange – 60 – 7.96%
  • Other Candidates – 36 – 4.77%

This may support the widely held suspicion that Georgetown is a hotbed of Republican voters. While Georgetown votes more Republican than the District at large, it’s still typically votes overwhelmingly Democratic. For instance, while Georgetown gave about 16% fewer votes to Obama than the rest of the city in 2008, it still gave him about 75% of its votes.

GM thinks that this election is a perfect argument for the adoption of the instant run off system, an argument he’s made elsewhere. The way that would work is that you would rank the candidates by your preferences. If one candidate doesn’t get 50% of the first choices, then the last place candidate is thrown out and the second preferences of his or her voters get spread out to the other candidates. If that doesn’t put a candidate over the top, then the process is repeated until it does. Continue reading


Filed under Government